In his amended complaint, Quick lists ten counts: I. Quick also asserts a number of state claims against DCI, and Musgrove and Daniels.īecause Quick has raised ten separate claims involving four different defendants, it may be helpful to set out the particular claims made against each defendant. section 2000e-2(a) (1), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991. (DCI) and two DCI supervisors, Brett Musgrove and Roger Daniels, constituted sex discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. Plaintiff Phil Quick alleges that the actions of Donaldson Company, Inc. This matter comes before the court on Defendants' motions for summary judgment, (Pleadings 65 & 72), which are resisted by Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM OPINION, AND RULING GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH REMAND OF STATE CLAIMSīREMER, United States Chief Magistrate Judge. Tom Zurek, Mark Aljets and Greg Naylor, for defendants Roger Daniels and Brett Musgrove. Millard, for defendant Donaldson Co., Inc. DONALDSON COMPANY, INC., Roger Daniels, and Brett Musgrove, Defendants.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |